The blood thinner Pradaxa is prescribed to prevent blood clots and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation or who have undergone surgery. Unfortunately, repeated warnings have now associated it with severe internal bleeding.
Pradaxa Lawsuit & Settlement Information
The FDA approved Pradaxa in 2010, and within six months, patients were reporting serious bleeding events. Although the agency has received over 4,000 reports of side effects and 542 deaths among users, they have not issued a recall.
The maker of the drug, Boehringer Ingelheim, also failed to warn of these potential dangers and the fact that no antidote existed to stop them.
In recent years, thousands of bleeding victims and their loved ones filed Pradaxa lawsuits. Due to the number of claims filed, cases were consolidated to a special federal Multi-District Litigation court in Illinois. The case was known as MDL No. 2385, IN RE: Pradaxa Product Liability Litigation, Southern District of Illinois.
During the course of litigation, evidence was presented to show that Boehringer Ingelheim knew of the internal bleeding risks of the drug, concealed internal studies rather than warn patients, and even destroyed evidence requested by the court.
In May of 2014, as Boehringer faced the start of trials over Pradaxa internal bleeding, they opted to pay approximately $650 million to settle all pending cases. The administration of this settlement was completed in the Spring of 2015.
That initial litigation is now closed, however, lawyers have begun a new round of Pradaxa lawsuits for those not included in the first settlement.
Lawyers Pursue a 2nd Settlement for Victims
In May of 2014, lawyers for Boehringer Ingelheim and those victims suffering internal bleeding reached a settlement of $650 million for what was supposed to be around 3,600 people.
However, by the end of the settlement, more than 4,000 victims were included, diminishing the award for each person.
The first Pradaxa settlement was reached before a single case made it to a jury trial. Due to the uncertainties of trial, this provided guaranteed compensation for thousands of victims. However, it also made it difficult to predict how much may have been awarded.
Many believe that Boehringer did not pay an adequate amount to those that suffered hospitalization, permanent injuries or the death of a loved one from Pradaxa bleeding.
Some lawyers believe that, had the company been forced to defend itself in a public trial, they may have paid more for victims.
Now, lawyers filing the new Pradaxa lawsuits in 2015 are seeking to pursue cases to a jury trial in order to ensure the manufacturer pays adequate compensation to victims.
The litigation process could take a year or more, however, this is the only way victims may receive a second Pradaxa settlement.
For more information on the side effects or warnings of Pradaxa, or to see if your case qualifies for the 2015 lawsuits, contact us today. We are available 24 hours a day to provide help.
Latest Pradaxa news from DrugNews
- Study Suggests Aspirin Is As Effective as Expensive Blood Thinners blocks gets swallowed here, ' so the month and year are concatenated in one expression instead ' of relying on the markup between them. %> Mar 2018
- The State of Blood Thinners Now: Latest Research and Litigation Updates blocks gets swallowed here, ' so the month and year are concatenated in one expression instead ' of relying on the markup between them. %> Jul 2017
- Mixed Results on Blood Thinners: Heart Benefits or Bleeding Dangers? blocks gets swallowed here, ' so the month and year are concatenated in one expression instead ' of relying on the markup between them. %> Feb 2017
- Pradaxa Maker Tries to Block New Lawsuit from Deceased Victim's Family blocks gets swallowed here, ' so the month and year are concatenated in one expression instead ' of relying on the markup between them. %> Nov 2016
- New Studies Announced to Compare All Blood Thinner Drugs for First Time blocks gets swallowed here, ' so the month and year are concatenated in one expression instead ' of relying on the markup between them. %> Aug 2016